“Our research shows that the Standish definitions of successful and challenged projects have four major problems:

  • they’re misleading,
  • one-sided,
  • pervert the estimation practice,
  • and result in meaningless figures.”

Source: J. Laurenz Eveleens, Chris Verhoef, “The Rise and Fall of the Chaos Report Figures,” IEEE Software, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 30-36, January/February, 2010. http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/MS.2009.154

Also check out the following article:

  • Standish Report – Standish Report and Naive Statistics Finally, A Challenge to the Standish Report Project Failure Rate The current assessment of the Standish Report is: “The Rise and Fall of the Chaos Report Figures,” J.
Print Friendly

Related Post

Projects failure rate – the conventional wisdom ... The Problem Don’t be fooled, as despite what you might have heard, told or read, projects’ failure rate is not as high as some might want you to b...
Projects Failure Rate – the Threequel A quick recap Over the past week I've had an interesting discussion with Steven Romero about certain aspects associated with the use of the Standish C...
The Scientific Method and the IT Projects Failure ... Scientific method refers to a body of techniques for investigating phenomena, acquiring new knowledge, or correcting and integrating previous knowledg...
A quote of the day – re. the Standish Report “Our research shows that the Standish definitions of successful and challenged projects have four major problems: they’re misleading, one-sid...

No Comments

  1. Pingback: Shim Marom

  2. Pingback: Shim Marom

  3. Pingback: Bent Flyvbjerg

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

%d bloggers like this: